RESPONSE TO THE GOVERNMENT’S LANGUAGE STRATEGY

This is a very ambitious strategy in terms of increasing the number of Welsh speakers. If this had been a priority for the Welsh Government from the start, we would be well on the way to seeing Welsh as being the normal language for a new generation of speakers.

Theme 1 is admirable. It includes an emphasis on passing on the language within the family – the foundation of all language planning. There is an emphasis on the early years and then on significant increase in Welsh language education. The second theme is the Welsh language in the workplace and the social use of the language. This again is appropriate. Theme 3 also notes key areas; the community and the economy and widespread language planning.

Is there any room for doubt? We would certainly wish to praise this strategy, but the devil is in the detail.

The section ‘Community and the Economy’ states the ambition, but is skimpy on action. It mentions land planning, but surprisingly does not seem to mention planning in relation to housing, and this is a matter that must be addressed. The action plan that accompanies the strategy mentions the publication of the Technical Advice Note 20, which encompasses planning and the Welsh Language, but there is no mention of the role of planning authorities or how local authorities can set viable language targets within their Local Development Plans. This is a glaring omission.

The section on the social use of the Welsh language is enlightened in terms of principle, but short on practical steps to reach the goals. Although the Welsh Government has supported the the establishment of Welsh Language Centres in the past, there is no suggestion that this support will continue. In our opinion, the creation of such centres in in towns and villages across Wales is essential, and this can be tackled creatively, by contributing to existing structures, enabling them to develop as Welsh Language Centres, per the nature of the area being served.

It is good to see that there is a wish to create more informal opportunities for young people aged 14 – 19 to use the language. We need to be careful, though, as this need already exists for those in Welsh language education, before risking spreading resources too thinly for those who attend English-medium schools.

Much of the strategy deals with the expansion of the Welsh language within education. This again is admirable, but practical difficulties arise. Dyfodol i’r Iaith’s Chair had a meeting with education officers in Swansea two days after the publication of the strategy. It became clear that they were unaware of the strategy. Furthermore, they were expected, like all other authorities, to present funding applications to the Government for the development of schools under the 21st Century Schools scheme by the end of July this year. £600 million is available, but applications had to be submitted before the Government approved the authorities’ Welsh Language in Education Strategic Schemes. It became obvious that there was no connection between the strategy, the authorities’ own Welsh Language Education Plans, and the 21st Century Schools funding. This funding covers the period 2019-24. It is likely that if round goes ahead, that no funding will be allocated in relation to the strategy until the next round in 2024, thus losing 7 years of funding.

Therefore Dyfodol i’r Iaith has asked the Government to delay this funding process for six months, to allow local authorities to adopt the Government’s vision of rapid growth in Welsh language education. Without this, it is sure to fail to reach the targets. Another basic problem with the strategy is lack of funding. If the Government wishes to see rapid progress in terms of increasing the number of Welsh speakers, then it must invest significantly in training teachers and restructuring schools. Some resources are being used now for year-long courses to teach Welsh to teachers, but this is limited, and falls short of achieving the growth targets.

We need to ask whether the Government has been blinded by calls to create a million Welsh speakers, and to transform the English schools’ system, much need as this is. Although these are praiseworthy aims, there is a danger that they are unrealistic, and the dream can rapidly turn to nightmare. In order to reach the target of a million speakers, it has been calculated that 50% of 7 year olds in Wales need to be in Welsh-medium education by 2030. This would mean increasing the number of Welsh-medium schools from 400 to 800. To achieve this, 6-8000 additional Welsh teachers would be needed. Knowing that the number of potential teachers is currently getting smaller, a sense of reality is required.

It is clear to us that realistic and believable policies are required, we need to start from where we stand in relation to all relevant areas. The truth of the matter is that we need to establish a powerful Language Authority, which will formulate a national language scheme to carefully map how the different aims may be reached, and ensuring close coordination between all Government departments. Achieving this will require adequate and not insubstantial funding.

REASONS FOR REJECTING THE ADOPTION OF THE LOCAL JOINT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR GWYNEDD AND MÔN

In partnership with the following language organisations; Cylch yr Iaith, Canolfan Hanes Uwchgwyrfai and Cymdeithas yr Iaith,  Dyfodol i’r Iaith is part of the Gwynedd and Môn Housing and Planning Campaign Committee. This Committee was established to challenge and oppose the Local Development Plan, which is about to be decided upon by both authorities.

If you are also concerned about the impact this Plan will have on the Welsh language, then we would ask you to write to your county Councillor, and demostrate your objection by joining the gathering arranged outside the Gwynedd Council Offices in Caernarfon at 1.15 on 28/07, and Cyngor Môn’s offices, Llangefni ar 9.15 on 31/07.

Our objections to Plan can be summarised thus:.

  • TOO MANY HOUSES 

The Plan states that the number of houses; 7,902 between the two authorities, provides for population growth. This growth is based upon in-migration, and in preparing for this, promotes it. The process was based upon allocating county totals for Gwynedd and Môn, and distributing these to communities. This is totally unacceptible. The totals should have been based upon supplying the local needs of each of the communities.

 

  • FLAWED LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT

In contrast to assessements of other aspects of the Plan, the Joint Planning Policy Unit did not commission an independent assessment of its language sustainability. This work was undertaken by the Unit itself, despite its admission that it had no expertise in this area. The language organisations decided to commission an independent assessment from the language consultancy, Hanfod. This study concluded that the Plan proposed too many houses, and that as a result, the situation of the Welsh language would be weakened. The independent assessment was ignored by by the Unit.

 

  • FLAWED LANGUAGE POLICY

The Plan’s Strategic Policy 1 (The Welsh Language and Culture) does not support the Welsh language. The policy allows for damaging developments if it is possible to lessen the damage to some extent by ameliorative measures. Siân Gwenllian AM and Llyr Huws Gruffydd AM have stated that this policy is unacceptable.

 

  • FLAWED SURVEY

As part of their evidence base for the Plan, both local authorities conducted the ‘Gwynedd and Ynys Môn Housing and Language Survey’ between September and November 2013, but the statistician Hywel Jones (Statiaith) demonstrated that the methodology adopted was seriously flawed. His assessment of the survey concluded that it was statistically invalid and its conclusions unreliable.

 

  • PERCENTAGE OF AFFORADLE HOUSING TOO LOW

The percentage of affordable housing within a development is set as low as 10%. Evidence of need shows that this percentage should be much higher. This policy means that open market housing will constitute 90% of these housing developments.

 

  • NUMBER OF LOCAL HOUSING MARKET POLICY COMMUNITIES TOO LOW

Only in a very limited number of communities will the policy of limiting housing to local people be implemented.

 

  • FEWER AREAS ALLOCATED CLUSTERS

Fewer small villages and rural areas will be allocated clusters, leading to a low number of houses. This will negate the opportunity for many communities to ensure their sustainablity and natural growth by supplying local need.

 

  • NO GRADUAL DEVELOPMENTS

It will not be possible to impose conditions upon developers to build gradually; that is, to build a specific number of houses at a time, according to an agreed timetable.

 

 

DYFODOL’S MEETING WITH THE EDUCATION SECRETARY AND WELSH LANGUAGE MINISTER

At this key point in the development of the Welsh Language Strategy, and of pressing need for a meaningful process to ensure that the aim of creating a million Welsh speakers is reached, Dyfodol was grateful of the recent opportunity to meet with Kirsty Williams and Alun Davies.

If we are to realise this vision, then clearly, education, a significant growth in Welsh-medium education, and ensuring a suitably-qualified workforce will be essential. This was our main message for the politicians and civil servants. In addition to this, we also stressed the importance of structures and policies which encourage a positive response to the language at all levels; from the Welsh Government to local authorities, to sharing the message of the benefits of Welsh education amongst parents and soon-to-be parents. This was set firmly within the context of ensuring that that the planned million speakers be given opportunities to learn Welsh to a high standard and be given opportunities to use it across a wide range of situations and experiences.

We received a positive hearing and were encouraged by the Government’s confirmation of the need to raise language and cultural awareness and to promote the Welsh language beyond the classroom.

It was also confirmed that Aled Roberts’s report on Welsh Language in Education Strategic Schemes (i.e. the local authorities’ schemes) is expected within the next few weeks. We repeated our opinion that these schemes need to be overhauled. One important improvement would be to significantly extend the current three year cycle to facilitate the long term planning of Welsh language education. We would also call for language monitoring to start from when the child enters the education system, rather than at 7 years old, as is the current requirement.

We will await the White Paper, which is due to be published this summer for more information on the Government’s plans and for further details regarding the establishment of an Agency to promote the language.